Public exploitation
Exploit catalog
Every public exploit we catalog, in one index. Search by CVE, exploit name or technology — and see, right beside it, what the flaw is actually worth: severity, exploitation probability, and whether it’s already under attack.
76,647cataloged exploits
34,986CVEs with public exploitation
24,695lab-tested
AllExploit-DB 24,443Referência 21,899GitHub PoC 14,014VulnCheck XDB 8,571Nuclei 4,248Metasploit 3,472✓ verified onlyrecentpopularrisk
14,014 exploits
GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2017-0144
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2019-0708批量蓝屏恶搞
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 342
An Attempt to Port BlueKeep PoC from @Ekultek to actual exploits
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
JasonLOU/CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 40
CVE-2019-0708 - BlueKeep (RDP)
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
A quick scanner for the CVE-2019-0708 "BlueKeep" vulnerability.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 433
CVE-2019-2725 命令回显
Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supporte
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1,181
Proof of concept for CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 2
haishanzheng/CVE-2019-0708-generate-hosts
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 6
infiniti-team/CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
CVE-2019-0708 bluekeep 漏洞检测
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 5
基于360公开的无损检测工具的可直接在windows上运行的批量检测程序
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 127
Only Hitting PoC [Tested on Windows Server 2008 r2]
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
ABIZCHI/CVE-2018-9995_dvr_credentials
TBK DVR4104 and DVR4216 devices, as well as Novo, CeNova, QSee, Pulnix, XVR 5 in 1, Securus, Night OWL, DVR Login, HVR L
60RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 2
aenlr/strutt-cve-2014-0114
Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in o
60RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
Arbitrary deserialization that can be used to trigger SQL injection and even Code execution
active_support/core_ext/hash/conversions.rb in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.15, 3.0.x before 3.0.19, 3.1.x before 3.1.10, an
60RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
caxmd/CVE-2017-13156
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Product: Android. Versions: 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0,
43RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 71
Drupal8's REST RCE, SA-CORE-2019-003, CVE-2019-6340
Drupal core - Highly critical - Remote Code Execution
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 6
Mass MikroTik WinBox Exploitation tool, CVE-2018-14847
MikroTik RouterOS through 6.42 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files and remote authenticated
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
50 first stargazers will get get the tool via email
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
yehnah
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to execute code remotely vi
93RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 13
cve-2019-0708 poc .
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC
CVE-2019-0708 PoC Exploit
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 3
CVE-2019-12460|Reflected XSS in WebPort-v1.19.1 impacts users who open a maliciously crafted link or third-party web page.
Web Port 1.19.1 allows XSS via the /access/setup type parameter.
23RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 3
cyy95/CVE-2019-0232-EXP
When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17, 8.5.0
60RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 7
Check vuln CVE 2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 17
Goby support CVE-2019-0708 "BlueKeep" vulnerability check
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 2
Working proof of concept for CVE-2019-0708, spawns remote shell.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 921
A quick scanner for the CVE-2019-0708 "BlueKeep" vulnerability.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗We index only the public link to the proof of concept — we never host or redistribute exploitation code. Sources: PoC-in-GitHub, Exploit-DB, Nuclei, Metasploit and VulnCheck XDB. A public PoC existing does not mean the flaw is exploitable in your environment.