Public exploitation
Exploit catalog
Every public exploit we catalog, in one index. Search by CVE, exploit name or technology — and see, right beside it, what the flaw is actually worth: severity, exploitation probability, and whether it’s already under attack.
79,305cataloged exploits
36,465CVEs with public exploitation
24,695lab-tested
AllExploit-DB 24,466Referência 23,051GitHub PoC 15,051VulnCheck XDB 8,883Nuclei 4,361Metasploit 3,493✓ verified onlyrecentpopularrisk
79,305 exploits
Exploit-DB
IceWarp 10.4.4 - Local File Inclusion
IceWarp Mail Server through 10.4.4 is prone to a local file inclusion vulnerability via webmail/calendar/minimizer/index
50RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB✓ VexDay Proof
KACE System Management Appliance (SMA) < 9.0.270 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
The Quest Kace K1000 Appliance is vulnerable to JavaScript injection.
23RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB✓ VexDay Proof
KACE System Management Appliance (SMA) < 9.0.270 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
The Quest Kace K1000 Appliance misconfigures the Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism.
28RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB✓ VexDay Proof
KACE System Management Appliance (SMA) < 9.0.270 - Multiple Vulnerabilities
The Quest Kace K1000 Appliance is vulnerable to multiple Blind SQL Injections.
23RISK
open ↗Metasploit300
Supra Smart Cloud TV Remote File Inclusion
Supra Smart Cloud TV allows remote file inclusion in the openLiveURL function, which allows a local attacker to broadcas
43RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB
WordPress Plugin Form Maker 1.13.3 - SQL Injection
In the Form Maker plugin before 1.13.3 for WordPress, it's possible to achieve SQL injection in the function get_labels_
23RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 37
Privesc through import of Sheduled tasks + Hardlinks - CVE-2019-1069
Task Scheduler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
71RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
initial-access
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 27
Python script to detect bluekeep vulnerability (CVE-2019-0708) with TLS/SSL and x509 support
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
initial-access
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2017-0144
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
100RISK
open ↗Metasploit600
Ahsay Backup v7.x-v8.1.1.50 (authenticated) file upload
An insecure file upload and code execution issue was discovered in Ahsay Cloud Backup Suite 8.1.0.50. It is possible to
60RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
initial-access
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
denial-of-service
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
initial-access
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 40
CVE-2019-0708 - BlueKeep (RDP)
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
JasonLOU/CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2019-0708批量蓝屏恶搞
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 342
An Attempt to Port BlueKeep PoC from @Ekultek to actual exploits
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB
Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop - 'BlueKeep' Denial of Service
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1
A quick scanner for the CVE-2019-0708 "BlueKeep" vulnerability.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 433
CVE-2019-2725 命令回显
Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supporte
100RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB
pfSense 2.4.4-p3 (ACME Package 0.59_14) - Persistent Cross-Site Scripting
In pfSense 2.4.4-p3, a stored XSS vulnerability occurs when attackers inject a payload into the Name or Description fiel
35RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 1,183
Proof of concept for CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB✓ VexDay Proof
Spidermonkey - IonMonkey Leaks JS_OPTIMIZED_OUT Magic Value to Script
The IonMonkey just-in-time (JIT) compiler can leak an internal JS_OPTIMIZED_OUT magic value to the running script during
28RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 6
infiniti-team/CVE-2019-0708
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗GitHub PoC★ 2
haishanzheng/CVE-2019-0708-generate-hosts
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unau
100RISK
open ↗Exploit-DB✓ VexDay Proof
Qualcomm Android - Kernel Use-After-Free via Incorrect set_page_dirty() in KGSL
Possible use after free issue due to race condition while attempting to mark the entry pages as dirty using function set
23RISK
open ↗VulnCheck XDB
initial-access
Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supporte
100RISK
open ↗We index only the public link to the proof of concept — we never host or redistribute exploitation code. Sources: PoC-in-GitHub, Exploit-DB, Nuclei, Metasploit and VulnCheck XDB. A public PoC existing does not mean the flaw is exploitable in your environment.